"Trustee Not Individually Liable" not recognized

The Trust Agreement at bk8845p1453 says "Trustee Not Individually Liable" but most of the documents with Individually before them are against the Trustee as an individual. This is in violation of the Trust Agreement. I don't understand why they were accepted by the Court. The Trust Agreement is a contract and the law of contracts applies.

On March 30, 2012, after going through traditional channels with no success, I tried to expose the accounting at bk467p191 by posting my web site http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . (Note, December 5, 2017: I believe the links are out of date)

                                               
1992.10.16  Trust Agreement at bk8845p1453.  
1993.03.20  Accounting at Book467page191 approved.
2000.07.24  Trustee's letter to judges.

 (1)  2012.03.30                       Trustee posts
 (2)  2012.05.11*Individually. Lien for $27,669 sent to Highland County, Bank1.  
 (3)  2012.07.26  Individually. Lien sent to Highland County, Bank 2.  
 (4)  2012.08.30  Individually. Complaint filed against Trustee.  
 (5)  2012.09.28  Individually. Injunction.  
 (6)  2012.10.05  Individually. Order (". . Trust shall not expire . . .")
 (7)  2012.10.22  Individually. Notice to appear in Virginia Court.   
 (8)  2012.12.04  Individually. Order to appear in Virginia Court.
 (9)  2013 01.25  Individually. Order removing Trustee using Trust Agreement.

*Individually:
The Trust Agreement at bk8845p1453 says "Trustee Not Individually Liable" but the documents with Individually before them are in violation of this. I don't understand why they were accepted by the Court. The law of contracts applies:  

(a) All of a contract applies or none of a contract applies. A contract can't be cherry picked.
(b) The clause "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the contract means what it says.
(c) A contract cannot be changed unless all the parties to the contract agree to the change and then it is a new contract.
(b) No one that is not a party to a contract can change a contract, not even a Court.

The issue is exposing the accounting in our Mother's Estate such as that at bk467p191. Is there anyone in our Country who would find the CPA Joanne L. Barnes (EIN 541040148, SSN 579-44-3240?) and the Attorney Edward White, who did this accounting, and have them show where the money went?

These documents skip over exposing bk467p191. Conferences and hearings and having our trusting sister agree with the accusations in the Complaint prepared by the law firm of B&K, none of which are true, does not expose accounting trails. If there is any doubt that the signature pattern for diverting attention from the accounting is to use a trusting family member as cover, shouldn't this remove it? The issue is exposing the accounting trails at bk467p191. Why would more justification be needed than the fact that it has never be done?